Jann Demystifying Affects

In a squabble between public agencies, the official administering of working together creates a "lead agency" trying to make improvements and a "responsible agency" providing a foundation of status quo. This dynamic is a more cautious set of rules guiding or obstructing a change agent. This facet of organizations can be exemplified by the internal workings of the Methodist Church or the building of a new public school with additional traffic measures on the streets. In an individual's psychology, our personality shadow makes us comfortable or not with the brain stem tenet "is this risk who I really am?" In personal life, for business, and in government, is the leader/risk worth being rewarded in merely making the effort for biased progress when the cautious authority is not persuaded to change? In material terms and to those providing income, is making accomplishments out of achievements that newly exist in the status quo of the organization a better reason to rate excellence as opposed to the Habits Performance Standard common in the marketplace?